![ftl superluminal 2 could not find class ftl superluminal 2 could not find class](https://images.slideplayer.com/26/8396272/slides/slide_13.jpg)
Invisible Spacetime (i-spacetime)Īt the object moves both in i-space and i-time. This invisible ageing of time is called invisible time or simply i-time. That is its ageing is invisible at to the objects in 3D space. In this time travel, the object has to undergo ageing and is also not explainable with respect to any object in 3D space. When an object attains it disappears in 3D space and when its velocity becomes just below the object reappears in 3D space but back in time. Superluminal movements cannot be defined by the objects in 3D space. This equation is capable of explaining superluminal time flow and time dilation phenomenon together. (1) can provide relation between stationary and moving objects at any velocity.
![ftl superluminal 2 could not find class ftl superluminal 2 could not find class](https://i.imgur.com/iBJ7EWz.png)
(2) is the time dilation equation in terms of ageing.Įq. If is the time that 3D space observers aged back, then FD= (negative sign indicates that is ticking back in time).įrom Figure 6, in right angled triangle AED,Įq. In other words the bus is going past in time. So their biological clock is reversed with respect to the clock inside the bus. But observers in 3D space should not disobey the law of causality. This is possible only if the events are occurring in reverse order. This implies when the bus proceeds from C to E, light appears to be traveling backward in 3D space. At constant if increases, CE increases and as a result FD increases. That is, the distance covered by light in 3D space is equal to or lesser than the distance covered by bus in i-space. Since, the distance covered by light beam along the line BD will never be greater than CE and the covered distance is say BF whereas FD is uncovered. In time, light is expected to cover the distance BD in 3D space. Points B´ and D are mentioned from a reference frame inside the bus. During the time, bus travels a distance from point C to say point E and light beam travels from say B´ to a point in bus roof say D. Since is superluminal, bus moves in i-space, not in 3D space. The instant light beam reaches point B, bus shifts its velocity to. Let be the time taken by the light beam to travel from bus floor to bus roof as shown in Figure 2. Both and are measured by a clock placed inside the bus. Light beam travels for time during which the bus takes velocity and light beam travels for time during which the bus takes velocity.
![ftl superluminal 2 could not find class ftl superluminal 2 could not find class](https://physicsworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/light-spiral-web-19812591-iStock_VikaSuh-1.jpg)
This will not create any contradiction because in this paper, the effect due to velocity is completely separated from that of and vice versa. This is like there is no time gap for acceleration from to. When the light beam is heading towards the bus roof, bus shifts to superluminal velocity at an instant. When the light source is switched on, light beam travels towards bus roof. Then from postulate 3, with respect to i-space, stationary object moves with velocity towards left, whereas bus is stationary. Time Flow Relation in Speed Interval [0, ∞)Ĭonsider a bus moving with constant subluminal velocity towards our right, relative to a stationary object.
![ftl superluminal 2 could not find class ftl superluminal 2 could not find class](https://profmattstrassler.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/opera1nudetected2.png)
The only exception is that light is not subjected to above 3 postulates and can possess a constant velocity c in both 3D space and i-space irrespective of reference frames. As a result, from the view of i-space, object B is stationary and object A is moving towards left and hence relative velocity is conserved. If object B, initiated from object A’s place, moves towards our right with velocity v relative to object A then from the view of i-space, 3D space moves towards left with the same velocity and so all the objects including A and B. From the view of i-space, 3D space exhibits a resultant recoil velocity for every movement of objects in it.Ĭonsider Figure 1. This is assumed because it is impossible to achieve superluminal movement in 3D space and so i-space is suggested for superluminal speeds.ģD space and i-space exist together but the object carried by them differs in accordance with the first assumption.ģ. Subluminal objects move in 3D space and superluminal objects move in i-space. Both Special Relativity and Faster Than Light concept are explained together from the view of i-space. Unlike 3D space, it is assumed that i-space can bear objects with superluminal speeds. This frame is considered to be placed in ‘Invisible space (i-space)’. In this paper, a single frame is suggested from which both subluminal and superluminal speeds can be explained. But there was no any preferred frame from which superluminal speed can be explained. That is, frames can exist to explain relative object movement. Subluminal velocity is a relative quantity.